Teaching Evaluations 2006-2009

Teaching Evaluations 2006-2009: Not all subjects taught were evaluated during this period.

Year Subject Workload** Organization T&L methods Support Availability Intellectual challenge Assessment Feedback Impact
2009 MKTG3024 Social marketing 4.8 5.2 5.2 6 5.4 5.34 5.4 5.3 5.6
2009 MKTG2031 Consumer Behaviour* 4.5 5.2 5 4.9 5.3 5.2 5 4.54 5
                     
2008 MKTG2032 e-Marketing 4.8 4.4 5.3 5.7 5.9 5.5 5.8 6.1 5.2
2008 MKTG2031 Consumer Behaviour* 4 5.41 5.4 5.2 5.7 5.4 5.2 5.1 5.2
2008 MKTG7050 Consumer Behaviour (PG) 5.1 5.3 5.3 5.8 5.9 5.8 5.6 5.6 6
2008 MKTG7037 eMarketing  (PG) 5.1 5.7 6.1 6.3 6.5 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.7
                     
2007 MKTG3022 Marketing Management* 4.4 4.2 4.1 4.7 4.6 4.8 5 4 4.5
                     
2006 BUSN3022 Non Profit Marketing 5 5.5 5.2 5.5 6.7 5.54 5.3 5 5.2
2006 BUSN8023 Services Marketing (PG) 5.1 5.8 5 5.8 6.7 5.6 5.5 5.7 5.6
2006 BUSN2032/BUSN8037

eMarketing  (UG/PG)

4.6 5.3 5.5 5.6 5.9 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.4

* Compulsory component of the major

 

ANUSET Questions.

(1) Very Poor (2) Unsatisfactory (3) Borderline (4) Satisfactory (5) Good (6) Very Good (7) Excellent

  1. Workload – Overall, how heavy did you find the workload of this course? (1 = too light, 7 = too heavy)
  2. Organisation and structure – The course was structured appropriately and was well organised.
  3. Teaching and learning methods – Teaching and learning methods and activities (e.g. lectures, tutorials, field classes etc.) were appropriate and effective, given the goals of the course.
  4. Quality of reference and support materials – (Reading /print/web pages; software; etc)
  5. Availability of contact – If you did not seek contact then please enter “NA”.Teaching staff were contactable to assist with student problems and needs.
  6. Intellectual challenge – The course challenged students intellectually and facilitated understanding (through content and materials; activities and tasks; integration and relating of content; etc.).
  7. Assessment for grading – Assessment tasks, requirements and criteria seemed appropriate, given the goals of the course.
  8. Feedback to assist learning – Adequate and appropriate feedback was provided to assist learning and keep students informed of their progress.

9 Overall impact on learning / development – All things considered, how would you rate the overall impact of this course on your learning and development (gain in knowledge, skills, motivation, development of personal attributes, etc).